Duis ac lorem sit amet nibh gravida malesuada rutrum ac velit.
Posted by: In: Newsletter 10 Jan 2014 0 comments

By Beau Ryan

Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

In the last quarter, Rockspring’s employees and families participated in many fundraising events for different local cancer organizations. These causes are very important to Rockspring as a company as well as to the individual employees who have had family members and friends effected by this terrible disease.

The first organization we partnered with was CanCare, a network of trained volunteers including cancer survivors, who provide emotional support to others facing cancer. We participated in the 21st Annual CanCare Golf Classic, which helped spread awareness of CanCare’s services and strengthen support for the organization in the community.

charity-golfThe second organization we supported was Get Your Rear In Gear, a group that empowers communities to promote prevention and early detection of colon cancer and support to those affected. Last year, Rockspring families and friends worked hard to bring this national event to Houston for the very first time. This year, Rockspring continued its efforts and managed the event for the second year in a row and saw overwhelming attendance.

charity-runThe last organization we supported was Heroes for Children, which is a group that acts as advocates and providers of financial and social assistance to families with children battling cancer. This year we participated in its 5th Annual Hold’em For Heroes Charity Poker Tournament, which raised much-needed funds for the agency’s mission to provide financial and social assistance to Texas families with children (0-22 years of age) battling cancer.

charity-pokerAt Rockspring, we are always keeping cancer victims, survivors and supporters in our thoughts and prayers. We will continue to support and promote cancer awareness and other philanthropic efforts in 2014.

Posted by: In: Newsletter 01 Jan 2014 0 comments

By Jim McAlister IV

President & Chief Executive Officer

This past October, I spoke at The Real Estate Private Equity Forum on Land & Homebuilding held in Las Vegas. I want to share with you my takeaways from the forum as well as the overwhelming good news about the land and homebuilding business in Texas.

There were a number of panels with economists, investors, builders and bankers from all over the country professing their particular expertise. The panel in which I shared my insights was “Looking at Today’s Macroeconomics: The Private Equity Forum on Where Are You Investing in the Land/Homebuilding Food Chain.”

Overall, most topics discussed at the event were relevant and interesting as the speakers were passionate about their particular niche in capitalizing on the sector. Although each had a different angle to accomplish this task, the common theme heard was that they all wanted to conduct business in Texas!

The speakers cited the following reasons about why Texas is great for business.

1.     Jobs– Texas is leading the U.S. in job creation and low unemployment.

2.     Population Growth– Texas is projected to double in size through 2040.

3.     Healthy Real Estate Fundamentals– Texas never experienced the boom and bust of the Great Recession, and its major cities are at or near the top of all homebuilding metrics.

4.     Business-Friendly Government – Texas is a low-regulation state and proactively works with large employers to attract them to the area.

5.     Low Cost of Living – Texas is well known for its affordable housing and no state income tax.

The Texas model of a business-friendly government with low taxation has been and will continue to attract residents from across the country and globe in search of a less expensive and better quality of life.

There’s a bumper sticker sometimes seen around the state that proclaims, I wasn’t born in Texas, but I got here as fast as I could. I think we’ll be seeing that sticker more and more in the years to come.

Posted by: In: Industry Insights 30 Oct 2013 0 comments

(Houston Chronicle) They can’t build fast enough to keep up with demand, which pushes prices higher 

Houston-area builders are selling houses before they can finish them and at prices close to 20 percent higher than they were two years ago, new data show.

Builders started 27,802 homes during the 12 months that ended in September, according to Metrostudy, an information and consulting firm. That’s a 24 percent increase over the same period a year earlier and the strongest 12-month period since 2008.

Yet supply is still lacking. Housing starts are still well below their 2006 peak of more than 50,000.

Based on job creation and population growth, “we’re still not building enough homes,” said David Jarvis, regional director of Metrostudy. “It’s still very tight.”

As a result, consumers are paying more for new construction.

In a market that typically sees around 4 percent annual home price appreciation, recent increases have been much higher.

The median price for a new home was $255,183 in the third quarter, up 12.5 percent from last year.

“We’re making money in real estate again,” Jarvis said.

Buyers are devouring new homes.

During the third quarter, buyers closed on 7,044 new homes, bringing the annualized number to 24,919 closings – 20 percent higher than a year ago.

“It’s hard to keep spec homes on the ground right now,” said Will Holder, president of Trendmaker Homes. “When a home’s available, it sells pretty quickly.”

Indeed, the number of completed homes for sale remains at historic lows as builders are selling many of their homes before they’re completed.

The supply of finished and vacant homes is around 1.5 months, well below the 10-year average of 2.5 months, according to the Metrostudy data.

With supply constrained, further increases in land and housing prices are expected.

“We have a razor-thin inventory of housing and lots, with the backdrop of massive demand,” said Jim McAlister IV, president and CEO of Rockspring Capital, a Houston-based real estate private equity firm that buys land and residential lots.

Houston’s growing economy, particularly the energy industry, is driving the demand.

While the pace of job growth has slowed from earlier this year, it’s still ahead of the 10-year average growth rate of 2 percent for this area, the Metrostudy report says.

Low resale inventory and low mortgage rates have been pushing buyers to new housing. Some of the demand is coming from renters who may have moved to Houston a year or two ago for jobs and are now deciding to put down more permanent roots.

Land, labor and material costs are creeping up, too, pushing prices higher.

“The price of land and the price of finished lots is going to be higher next year, and it’s going to be passed along,” Holder said.

More builders are buying land to develop themselves. Traditionally, single-family land developers buy property, divide it into lots and offer it to the builders.

As the housing market recovers nationwide, builders have been looking at other ways to grow.

This week, The Woodlands-based LGI Homes filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for an initial public offering to sell 9 million shares of common stock at between $13 and $15 per share.

The company has applied to list the stock on the Nasdaq under the symbol LGIH. It expects to net about $114.2 million.

The company said it will put $36.9 million of that toward acquiring certain assets of GTIS, a New York joint-venture partner. It also will use some of the money to fund land acquisition, lot development and construction.

To view the Houston Chronicle article, click here.

Posted by: In: Industry Insights 28 Oct 2013 0 comments

(Time Magazine) They say the Lone Star State has four seasons: drought, flood, blizzard and twister. This summer 97% of the state was in a persistent drought; in 2011 the Dallas–Fort Worth area experienced 40 straight days in July and August of temperatures of 100* or higher. The state’s social services are thin. Welfare benefits are skimpy. Roughly a quarter of residents have no health insurance. Many of its schools are less than stellar. Property-crime rates are high. Rates of murder and other violent crimes are hardly sterling either. A recent report from the FBI found that the home state of Chuck Norris led the nation as the place the most people got punched or kicked to death in 2012.

So why are more Americans moving to Texas than to any other state?

Texas has acquired a certain cool factor recently. The pundit Marshall Wittmann has called it “America’s America,” the place where Americans go when they need a fresh start. The state’s ethnic and cultural diversity has made places like Austin and Marfa into magnets for artists and other bohemians.

But I believe the real reason Americans are headed to Texas is much simpler. As an economist and a libertarian, I have become convinced that whether they know it or not, these migrants are being pushed (and pulled) by the major economic forces that are reshaping the American economy as a whole: the hollowing out of the middle class, the increased costs of living in the U.S.’s established population centers and the resulting search by many Americans for a radically cheaper way to live and do business.

One of these pioneers is Casey Colando. When he was just 19, he bought–sight unseen–five acres of Big Bend mountain desert country in Texas as an investment. It was just $300 an acre, far away both culturally and geographically from his native upstate New York. Four years later, in 2008, Colando moved to his homestead in the magnificent but remote region of West Texas.

A graduate of the State University of New York at Canton, where he studied alternative energy, Colando now lives with his wife Sara some 80 miles from the nearest town (Alpine, pop. 6,000). The couple bought more land adjoining their original property, and they run an alternative-energy business that serves various settlers who have moved to this isolated corner of Texas–helping their neighbors eschew what Colando calls “the big electric company” and live off the grid by installing solar and wind power.

Colando says he first tried to launch his alternative-energy business in upstate New York. “It was difficult work fo a small business there,” he says. “The costs were higher, and there were fewer business opportunities, more regulations. So I came out West, and I haven’t looked back.”

To a lot of Americans, Texas feels like the future. And I would argue that more than any other state, Texas looks like the future as well–offering us a glimpse of what’s to come for the country at large in the decades ahead. The U.S. is experiencing ever greater economic inequality and the thinning of its middle class; Texas is already one of our most unequal states. America’s safety net is fraying under the weight of ballooning Social Security and Medicare costs; Texas’ safety net was built frayed. Americans are seeking a cheaper cost of living and a less regulated climate in which to do business; Texas has those in spades. And did we mention there’s no state income tax? (Texas is one of only seven states in the union that lack the levy.)

There’s a bumper sticker sometimes seen around the state that proclaims, i wasn’t born in Texas, but i got here as fast as i could. As the U.S. heads toward Texas, literally and metaphorically, it’s worth understanding why we’re headed there–both to see the pitfalls ahead and to catch a glimpse of the opportunities that await us if we make the journey in an intelligent fashion.


The first thing to understand about our more Texan future is what’s happening to the American workforce on the whole: average is over.

More and more workers are leaving the middle class–headed both up and down–and fewer workers are moving into it. Median household income has fallen about 5% since the Great Recession ended in 2009; in that same period, 58% of job growth was in lower-wage occupations, defined as those paying $13.83 an hour or less.

However, it’s not that incomes are stagnant generally. Earners at the top have done very well–but the gains have been distributed quite unevenly. Last year the top 1% of earners took home 19.3% of household income, their largest share since 1928. The top 10% of earners didn’t do so badly either, taking home a record 48.2% of household income.

We know the forces driving this: globalization, advances in computing, and automation mean that Americans are facing tougher competition than ever before from workers overseas, machines and smart software. The individuals moving up the economic ladder are the ones who’ve responded to this competition by upgrading their skills and efforts. The ones moving down are largely those who have failed or been unable to respond at all.

The group struggling the most is the young. People with four-year college degrees earn less today than graduates did in 2000, and over time this will translate into persistently lower earnings. And too many young people today, even if they have jobs, have failed to establish themselves on career ladders. If we look at Americans ages 16 to 24 who are not enrolled in school, only 36% are working full time, 10% less than in 2007. A 24-year-old who is working part time for a website, as a Pilates instructor or in retail may be having fun, but he or she probably won’t be receiving strong promotions a couple of decades down the line.

Meanwhile, the cost of hanging on to a middle-class lifestyle is increasing. As a 2010 report by the Department of Commerce found, looking at economic data from the past two decades, “The prices for three large components of middle-class expenses have increased faster than income: the cost of college, the cost of health care and the cost of a house.”

Texas isn’t immune to any of this, of course. But it just may be the friendliest state for those who worry about their prospects in this new normal. For starters, the job scene is markedly better (more on that in a moment). And more crucially, it’s cheaper to live in Texas and cheaper to thrive there too. Don’t underestimate the power of that lower cost of living, for it can be the difference between a trailer and an apartment–between an apartment and a home.


As davy crockett said in 1835, as his political fortunes ran out in Tennessee, “They might all go to hell, and I would go to Texas.” The phrase Gone to Texas (sometimes abbreviated GTT) was the expression once used by Americans fleeing to the Lone Star State to escape debt or the law–posted as a sign on a fence or scratched into the door of an abandoned home.

While today’s migrants aren’t the vagabonds and outlaws of the 19th century, people are still “gone to Texas.” Texas is America’s fastest-growing large state, with three of the top five fastest-growing cities in the country, according to Forbes: Austin, Dallas and Houston. In 2012 alone, total migration to Texas from the other 49 states in the union was 106,000, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Since 2000, 1 million more people have moved to Texas from other states than have left.

To get a sense of who these migrants are, consider Tara Connolly. In 2005 the New York City native was sharing a 500-sq.-ft. apartment with her then boyfriend in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn–a gentrified neighborhood where studio apartments rent for about $2,000 a month and sell for about half a million dollars. Feeling stressed, restless and in need of a change, she read an article about Austin and decided to pack up and move, with little more than the hope of finding a job in her field, graphic design.

Eight years later, Connolly is in her mid-30s and works at a hip marketing company in Austin, and she’s the owner of a vintage midcentury home twice the size of her old New York City apartment. It comes with a mortgage payment half the size of her big-city rent. “Buying a house was not something I was thinking about when I came to Austin,” Connolly says. “But here you have people in their 20s buying houses.”

When Connolly announced that she was moving to Austin, she was met with looks of alarm from her Bronx-born family. But she says that after visiting her and seeing her new home, her family has changed its tune. “They say they can’t believe how green it is,” she says. “They thought it was all tumbleweed.”

Connolly’s story is hardly unique. And the general pattern is by no means a new one, according to Bernard Weinstein, an economist and associate director of Southern Methodist University’s Maguire Energy Institute. Weinstein has been observing the Texas economy for more than 30 years and says that “whenever the economy is bad in the rest of the country, that pushes people to the Sun Belt.” Along with the affordable housing and a warm climate, newcomers are drawn by the notion that in the case of Texas, jobs are plentiful. Texas’ unemployment rate is currently 6.4%–high for Texas but below the national rate of 7.3%.

And as Connolly’s story shows, these pilgrims aren’t coming just from places like Michigan, where a major industry has collapsed, but also from more prosperous states like New York and California. Over the past 20 years, more than 4 million Californians have moved to Texas, according to Weinstein. “That’s two cities the size of Houston,” he notes.

Jed Kolko, chief economist for San Francisco–based real estate website Trulia, says that from 2005 to 2011, 183 Californians moved to Texas for every 100 Texans who moved to California. “Home prices, more than any other factor, cause people to leave,” Kolko says.

Why is California, for instance, so expensive and Texas so cheap? “God wanted California to be expensive,” Kolko says, with its ideal climate and attractive but limited real estate squeezed between the mountains and the ocean. The demand for a piece of the California dream was destined to be expensive, and lawmakers passed strict building codes to add to the bottom line.

Texans might argue that they have some beautiful real estate too, but in the wide-open spaces surrounding the state’s major urban areas, there is no ocean to constrict growth, and there are far fewer stringent rules. There are no zoning laws in many unincorporated areas beyond the booming urban centers, where Texas has lots of land.

The lower house prices, along with a generally low cost of living–helped along by cheap labor, cheap produce and cheap gas (currently about $3 a gallon)–really matter when it comes to quality of life. For instance, the federal government calculated the Texas poverty rate as 18.4% for 2010 and that of California as about 16%. That may sound bad for Texas, but once adjustments are made for the different costs of living across the two states, as the federal government does in its Supplemental Poverty Measure, Texas’ poverty rate drops to 16.5% and California’s spikes to a dismal 22.4%. Not surprisingly, it is the lower-income residents who are most likely to leave California.

On the flip side, Texas has a higher per capita income than California, adjusted for cost of living, and nearly catches up with New York by the same measure. Once you factor in state and local taxes, Texas pulls ahead of New York–by a wide margin. The website MoneyRates ranks states on the basis of average income, adjusting for tax rates and cost of living; once those factors are accounted for, Texas has the third highest average income (after Virginia and Washington State), while New York ranks 36th.


Of course, it’s not just cheap living that draws people to Texas. It’s also jobs. In the past 12 months, Texas has added 274,700 new jobs–that’s 12% of all jobs added nationwide and 51,000 more than California added. In a Moody’s Analytics study, seven of the top 10 cities for projected job growth through 2015 will be in Texas. Four Texas cities topped the list: Austin, McAllen (in the Rio Grande Valley), Houston and Fort Worth. “For the past 22 years, Texas has outgrown the country by a factor of more than 2 to 1,” Dallas Federal Reserve president Richard Fisher tells TIME, echoing an April speech in which he laid out the story of Texas growth at some length.

“My uninformed friends usually say, ‘But Texas creates low-paying jobs.’ To that I respond, You are right. We create more low-paying jobs in Texas than anybody else,” Fisher says. “But we also created far more high-paying jobs.” In fact, from 2002 to 2011, with 8% of the U.S. population, Texas created nearly one-third of the country’s highest-paying jobs.

“Most importantly,” Fisher says, “while the United States has seen job destruction in the two middle-income quartiles, Texas has created jobs for those vital middle-income workers too.” From 2001 to 2012, the number of lower-middle-income jobs in Texas grew by 14.4%, and the number of upper-middle-income jobs grew by 24.2%. If you look at the U.S. without Texas over the same period, the number of lower-middle jobs grew by an anemic 0.1%, and the number of upper-middle jobs shrank by 6%.

“The bottom line,” says Fisher, is that “we have experienced growth across all sectors and in all income categories … If you pull Texas out of the puzzle of the United States, the rest of the country falls down!”

How did Texas do it?

Texas Monthly senior editor Erica Grieder credits the “Texas model” in her recent book, Big, Hot, Cheap, and Right: What America Can Learn From the Strange Genius of Texas. “The Texas model basically calls for low taxes and low services,” she says. “In a sense, it’s just a limited-government approach.” Chief Executive magazine has named Texas the most growth-friendly state in the nation for nine years in a row. The ranking is based on survey results from its CEO readership, who grade the states on the basis of factors such as taxes and regulation, the quality of the workforce and the living environment. Cheap land, cheap labor and low taxes have all clearly contributed to this business-friendly climate. But that’s not the whole story.

“Certainly since 2008, the beginning of the Great Recession, it’s been the energy boom,” SMU’s Weinstein says, pointing to the resource boom’s ripple effect throughout the Texas economy. However, he says, the job growth predates the energy boom by a significant margin. “A decade ago, before the shale boom, economic growth in Texas was based on IT development,” Weinstein says. “Today most of the job creation, in total numbers, is in business and personal services, from people working in hospitals to lawyers.”

Of course, not everyone’s a fan of the Texas model. “We are not strong economically because we have low taxes and lax regulation. We are strong economically because of geography and geology,” says Scott McCown, a former executive director of the Center for Public Policy Priorities who is now a law professor at the University of Texas. “We’ve built an economy favoring the wealthy … If that’s the ultimate end result of the Texas model in a democratic society, it will be rejected.”

So will the rest of the country follow Texas’ lead? People are already voting with their feet. The places in the U.S. seeing significant in-migration are largely in relatively inexpensive parts of the Sun Belt. These are, by and large, affordable states with decent records of job creation–often with subpar public services and low taxes. Texas is just the most striking example. But Oklahoma, Colorado, the Carolinas and other parts of the South are benefiting from the same trends–namely that California, New York and the other high-tax, high-cost states are no longer such good deals for much of the U.S.’s middle and lower-middle classes.

The Americans heading to Texas and other cheap-living states are a bit like the mythical cowboys of our past–selfreliant, for better or worse.


For Americans heading to these places, the likelihood is that they’ll be facing slow-growing, stagnant or even falling wages. Yet it won’t be the dystopia that it may sound like at first. Automation and globalization don’t just make a lot of goods and services much cheaper–they sometimes make them free. There is already plenty of free online education, graded by computer bots, and free music on YouTube. Hulu and related online viewing services are allowing Americans to free up some money by cutting the cable cord. Facebook soaks up a lot of our free time, and it doesn’t cost a dime. The near future likely will bring free or very cheap online medical diagnosis.

This suggests that wages and GDP statistics may no longer be the most accurate gauges of real living standards. A new class of Americans will become far more numerous. They will despair at finding good middle-class jobs and decide to live off salaries that are roughly comparable to today’s lower-middle-class incomes. Some will give up trying so hard–but it won’t matter as much as it used to, because they won’t have to be big successes to live relatively well.

“The world of work is changing, and what we are learning is it’s no longer about the 9-to-5, it’s about the work itself,” says Gary Swart, CEO of oDesk, a global job marketplace that sells tools to allow businesses to hire and manage remote workers. “Millennials, they are about how to make an impact … They want freedom in their lives, and they care more about that than they do the financial rewards.”

For an example of one of these “new cowboys,” take Joe Swec. For most of his life, Swec, 32, has lived in beautiful (and, he notes, expensive) places. Born in the San Francisco Bay Area, he graduated from California Polytechnic State University with a degree in structural engineering and went to work in Healdsburg, working on the construction and restoration of several Sonoma County wineries. Then he headed south to work in Malibu. But he was not content.

“I wanted a career change,” he says. “I wanted to do something more creative, and I would fantasize about being an artist.”

So five years ago, Swec moved to Austin. “My friends thought I was crazy–why would I move to Texas?” he says. “They also wondered why I would leave a six-figure job. I saw it differently. I wanted my job to give me a happy life.”

After moving, Swec first worked as a bartender, then as a waiter. Then he got a job doing silk screens for a design company. Inspiration came along when he came across papers his grandfather had collected–scrapbooks filled with calligraphy and hand lettering. He found he had an affinity for the art of lettering, and as he worked on an outdoor mural, he wondered why he didn’t do this for a living. So he took up a career as a sign painter.

His hand-lettered signs now appear on the walls and doorways of some of Austin’s newest, liveliest restaurants and pubs. “My friends out in California don’t understand why I like it here,” Swec says. “But I have just developed a fondness for the local way of life.”

In the coming decades, some people may even go to extremes in low-cost living, like making their home in microhouses (of, say, about 400 sq. ft. and costing $20,000 to $40,000) or going off the grid entirely. Brad Kittel, owner of Tiny Texas Houses, blogs about his small homes built from salvaged materials at tinytexashouses.com His business, based in the small rural community of Luling, east of San Antonio, offers custom homes, plans, and lessons on how to be a salvage miner. So far he has built about 75 tiny homes, and he has plans for a tiny-home community built around a sort of central lodge house. Kittel, 57, is a former Austin developer who pioneered the gentrification of a crumbling East Austin neighborhood in the late 1980s. These days most of his buyers are baby boomers. “Downsizing was just a whisper. Now it’s turning into a mantra,” Kittel says. “My generation, we were accumulators–big houses, big cars. But now we have no big resources.”

The micro-home trend is being watched by traditional homebuilders as well. Texas-based developer D.R. Horton, a member of the New York Stock Exchange and one of the largest homebuilders in the country, built 29 microhomes sized from 364 to 687 sq. ft. in Portland, Ore., last year for an average price of $120,000 to $180,000 — admittedly far from the company’s headquarters in spacious Fort Worth.

In some ways, the new settlements of a Texas-like America could come to resemble trailer parks–culturally rich trailer parks, so to speak. The next Brooklyn may end up somewhere in the Dakotas. Fargo, anyone?

Nonetheless, America, a historically flexible nation in cultural and economic terms, will adjust. One of our saving graces may end up being just how wasteful we’ve been in the past. It will be possible for many consumers to cut back significantly on spending without losing too much in terms of material well-being and happiness.

The new frugality born of the Great Recession is unlikely to give way to the old conspicuous consumption anytime soon, if consumer studies are to be believed. Nick Hodson, a partner and member of the consumer and retail practice at Booz & Co., points to his company’s 2012 study of 2,000 grocery shoppers across the country. The study found that “value-seeking behavior” was here to stay.

“The recession caused about 20 to 30% more shoppers to adopt these behaviors as they adjusted to straitened personal circumstances or simply followed a set of perceived ‘acceptable’ frugal behaviors,” the study concluded. “Today, 75 to 90% of consumers are exhibiting these frugal shopping behaviors. What’s important is that a majority–perhaps two-thirds–of the newly frugal shoppers report that they will not revert to their previous behaviors as the recession ends.”


There are, of course, major downsides to the future I’m describing here. A lot of health care will become more expensive and harder to access. Many Americans will have to downsize their living quarters involuntarily. People in the shrinking middle class who want to have more than one child may find the costs too high. There is no longer the expectation, much less the guarantee, that living standards double or even increase much with each generation.

But it’s not all bad news–especially if we take the right steps to prepare. The flood of Americans moving to Texas shows us where we need to focus our attention; what these migrants have found in Texas shows us ways many of our cities and states can improve.

Most critically, across the country, our K-12 education system needs to be much more rigorous, so that more Americans will be prepared to succeed in the new high-tech era to come. Right now, labor markets and jobs are changing faster than schools, and that means graduates are being left behind. Education at all levels needs to be cheaper and easier to access–and family support for students needs to be much stronger as well.

There are also many small but important ways in which states and cities can adjust in order to incorporate some of the lessons Texas has to teach.

For instance, states could deregulate building so that rents and home prices could be much lower. Housing is one of the biggest costs in most people’s budgets, and it will be difficult to bring those costs down without greater competition and significantly higher urban density. In other words: San Francisco needs to become more like Houston when it comes to zoning.

Likewise, it would be a tremendous boon for low-skilled workers if we scaled back much of the occupational licensing that exists at the state and local levels. There’s no reason a worker should need legal permission to become, say, a barber or a cosmetologist, as is currently the case in many states. Is there any good reason that Nevada, Louisiana, Florida and the District of Columbia should require interior designers to take 2,190 hours of training and pass an exam before having the legal right to practice? By relaxing these and many other requirements, we could create a lot more decent jobs and lower prices for consumers at the same time.

A little more freedom in strategically targeted areas–that is, a little more Texas–could go a long way.

Don’t be scared. As Tara Connolly found, Texas is a welcoming place: “Everyone is just so friendly, and they look you in the eye.” And she wouldn’t even think of going back to New York City. “The constant stress doesn’t seem appealing,” she says. “The cost was insane, and it was time to start fresh. This was a good place to try.”

–Reported by Hilary Hylton/Austin

Cowen is a professor of economics at George Mason University. He is the author of Average Is Over: Powering America Beyond the Age of the Great Stagnation (Dutton, 2013).

To view the Time Magazine article, click here.

Posted by: In: Industry Insights 24 Oct 2013 0 comments

(Austin Business Journal)  Austin’s reputation as a job-creation machine has again propelled it to the top of a monthly report measuring economic indicators for all major U.S. metro areas.

With an overall score of 83.9 out of 100 based on 18 economic factors, Austin tops the list of 102 cities measured in the monthly report by The Business Journals’ On Numbers.

The Texas capital, with an unemployment rate of 5.2 percent and five-year wages growth from October 2008 through October 2013 of nearly 15 percent, had held first place for eight of the first 10 months in 2013. The city’s average weekly earnings per worker are now $919.12.

The biggest reason why Austin remains No. 1 is its job-growth record. On Numbers reports that Austin is the only city in the nation — pause for a second, and let that sink in for minute — with double-digit percentage job growth in that five-year period, at just under 11 percent. By comparison, no other U.S. city has seen five-year job growth higher than 8 percent.

Dallas-Fort Worth is No. 2 in the country with a total score of 81.3, in a virtual tie with Provo, Utah. Houston comes in at No. 4 at 76.9 while San Jose, Calif., rounds out the top five.

At the bottom of the U.S. list is Bridgeport, Conn., with a score of only 21 out of 100.

Just this week, a study by the Brookings Institution showed how Austin’s economy is rapidly evolving its global reach.

To view the Time Magazine article, click here.

Posted by: In: Industry Insights 04 Oct 2013 0 comments

(Fuel Fix) The United States will pass Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the world’s top oil and gas producer this year, according to a government report released Friday.

Led by oil booms in Texas and North Dakota, the nation’s crude oil production hit 7.5 million barrels per day in July, a 45 percent jump over July 2008. The United States produced 2.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in July, a 16 percent jump from five years, boosted largely by shale gas production in the Northeast, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Growth in petroleum output from Saudi Arabia and Russia has been very modest by comparison.

Innovations in drilling and fossil fuel production have opened new regions of the United States to oil and natural gas activity in recent years. Advancements in the technologies of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing made oil and gas production from deep, dense shale rock economic for producers, unleashing a new wealth of oil and gas on the energy-hungry nation.

In 2013, the United States is projected to produce nearly 50 quadrillion British thermal units of petroleum and natural gas, beating out No. 2 producer Russia by about 5 quadrillion British thermal units, the EIA said.

The boom is expected to continue. Analysts at investment banking firm Jefferies & Co. expect Texas’ prolific Eagle Ford Shale to reach oil production of 1 million barrels per day by next summer and soar to 1.8 million barrels per day by 2022.

However, Americans still consume far more fossil fuels than they produce. The United States used about 95 quadrillion British thermal units of energy in 2012, according to EIA data. Still, the surge in domestic oil and gas has affected the nation’s trade deficit.

The United States’ natural gas imports plummeted 21 percent between 2008 and 2012, while imports of crude oil and petroleum products fell 18 percent.

To view the Fuel Fix article, click here.

Posted by: In: Industry Insights 01 Oct 2013 0 comments

Jim McAlister IV will speak at the inaugural Real Estate Private Equity Forum on Land & Homebuilding hosted by the Information Management Network (IMN) on Oct. 17 in Las Vegas.

Now with a shortage of new homes in select markets, homebuilders are again in building mode. This conference will focus on the key issues regarding successfully investing in land and homebuilding by private equity and real estate funds and how they are working with homebuilders.

As president and CEO of the only private equity firm specializing in Texas land investments with all-cash purchases, McAlister was invited by IMN to share his expertise on the trends of Texas land investments. McAlister will be part of a panel of seven discussing how the market changes over the last year impacted investments, developing a nation-wide footprint, vertical integration: raw land to homebuilder, what are the returns firms are looking for in this space, and more. The panel will take place at the Bellagio and commence at 9:40 a.m.

For further information, including registration information and the complete agenda, click here.

Posted by: In: Industry Insights 05 Sep 2013 0 comments

(Houston Business Journal)  In the latest grand accolade for the Petro Metro, Forbes predicts that within a decade Houston will be known as “America’s next great global city.”

Forbes made the prediction in its article “A Map of America’s Future: Where Growth Will Be Over the Next Decade,” part of its“Reinventing America” series.

The article breaks the country into seven major regions, including the Third Coast — of which Houston is named the capital.

“Once a sleepy, semitropical backwater, the Third Coast, which stretches along the Gulf of Mexico from south Texas to western Florida, has come out of the recession stronger than virtually any other region,” Forbes writes. “Since 2001, its job base has expanded 7 percent, and it is projected to grow another 18 percent in the coming decade.”

Forbes notes two of Houston’s major economic powerhouses — energy and trade — as two of the driving forces behind the area’s success.

In addition to Houston’s energy prominence, Forbes also notes the racially and ethnically diverse metro has the world’s largest medical center and recently surpassed New York City as the No. 1 exporter nationwide. The diversification of the region’s economy will continue to increase as the area’s wealth grows, according to Forbes.

Last year, Forbes named Houston the coolest city in which to live, and the Bayou City has racked up numerous superlatives since then.

To view the Houston Business Journal article, click here.

Posted by: In: Newsletter 25 Jul 2013 0 comments

By Michael Ross

Senior Vice President, Asset Management & Entitlements

Rockspring Capital is excited to announce that it has either sold or put under contract more than $60,000,000 of inventory in the last 60 days at terrific pricing. One recent key transaction was the sale of Rockspring’s remaining property in the White Wing subdivision in New Braunfels, Texas, which delivered an unlevered IRR of 63.2 percent to its fund. Rockspring was originally able to analyze and act on this distressed asset more than 15 months ago when other market players were still trying to come to grips with the severe downturn and then turning of the U.S. economy.

The White Wing asset was a partially developed single-family residential property, consisting of 48 lots and approximately 17 acres of future lots. Working closely with its expert acquisition team in this San Antonio sub-market, Rockspring identified and closed on the asset within 20 days of its initial presentation to the Rockspring Capital Investment Committee. Rockspring then used its network of contacts to find a buyer, leading to a sale of 46 lots to Meritage Homes in May of 2012. Meritage closed on the remaining acreage in May of 2013, highlighting Rockspring’s ability to deliver liquidity in raw land real estate transactions.

Rockspring Capital continues to scour the state for opportunities that deliver outstanding returns in an ever-changing market. Rockspring’s unique expertise and ability to react quickly with all-cash acquisitions give it a competitive advantage in this complex, unsettled marketplace.

Posted by: In: Newsletter 20 Jul 2013 0 comments

By Jim Hynes

Managing Director

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently voted to adopt a previously proposed rule that lifts the marketing ban on many types of private investment funds, including real estate. The new rule was part of the Jumpstart Our Business Start-Ups Act, which went into law in April 2012.

The rule will substantially increase the scope of permitted activities during fundraising, allowing fund managers to engage in all forms of communication with prospective investors. It is widely believed that internet marketing will be used more in communicating information about fund offerings to new investors. All investors admitted to a fund must still qualify as “accredited” investors.

The new rule will likely benefit emerging firms and firms that are looking to expand their investor pool as these groups typically don’t have the same manpower or financial resources of the larger, established firms.

Rockspring Capital already has a robust online marketing program as we recently implemented this strategy to promote our new Texas real estate fund to international investors.  Now that we have a proven system in place, we will use it to reach new U.S investors quickly and conveniently.

For more information about our firm, contact me at jim.hynes@rockspring.com.